Home Relations between Ukraine and its neighboring countries
Ukraine
2 Q&A

Relations between Ukraine and its neighboring countries

Why is it important to deprive all Russian media of the independent status?

What is behind the dispute that led Ukrainian presidents to return their Polish honours

Why is it important to deprive all Russian media of the independent status?

Why is it important to deprive all Russian media of the independent status?

Published

09.08.2024

Russian media play a major part in disinformation and propaganda and are a serious problem for the world. After all, this is a grandiose structure that is able to channel its resources to disinformation in various countries of the world, and that’s exactly what it does.

Russia uses mass media as a weapon. In 2013, the so-called “Gerasimov doctrine” appeared, according to which “…the media landscape was considered as another field for reducing the combat potential of the enemy.” The entire information policy is planned and financed by the Kremlin with the aim of inciting genocidal sentiments against the Ukrainian people. Since 2014, the Russian media have been producing anything to justify the crimes of the Russian army, divide Ukrainians and blunt the international response.

But the Kremlin’s hybrid attacks do not end in Ukraine. The pro-Kremlin resource RT (short for Russia Today) has nearly twenty different bureaus around the world that Russia uses as weapons of mass disinformation.

On February 27, 2022, Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, said, “The state-owned Russia Today and Sputnik, as well as their subsidiaries will no longer be able to spread their lies to justify Putin’s war and to sow division in our Union.” Ten months later, in December 2022, the EU decided to suspend the work of another four Russian channels. Despite this fight against Russian propaganda in Europe, it still continues to exist there.

Modern wars have a hybrid nature – and the Russian media are actively involved in them. Since 2014, the Kremlin has extended its presence around the world: influencing Brexit and spreading misinformation about COVID vaccines. Some of Russia’s information operations in Africa included discrediting the Supreme Court of Kenya, laying the groundwork for military coups in Mali and Niger, and promoting xenophobia in South Africa. In just three years, Russia informationally interfered in the elections there at least four times.

Russia used the 2018 FIFA World Cup to boost Actualidad RT’s influence in Latin America. And over the past two years, the Kremlin has successfully spread misinformation about the COVID vaccine and anti-Western sentiment in Latin America.

In the United States, harmful Russian disinformation has been spreading for decades. In the 1980s, for example, Moscow ran a whole AIDS campaign, claiming that it was an American biological weapon. This fake was so successful that it caused real political problems for the United States, and more importantly, it resulted in the deaths of thousands of innocent people.

Russian media are a strategic information weapon that has been terrorizing the world for decades. Therefore, it is important to deprive them of their independent status.

What is behind the dispute that led Ukrainian presidents to return their Polish honours

What is behind the dispute that led Ukrainian presidents to return their Polish honours

Published

17.07.2026

Polish President Karol Nawrocki stripped Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Poland’s highest honour, the Order of the White Eagle, in response to Ukraine’s decision to name a Special Operations Forces unit after the “Heroes of the UPA”. This move continues the anti-Ukrainian rhetoric that featured prominently in Nawrocki’s presidential campaign. Yet his current position contradicts what he himself said three years ago about Ukrainians’ right to choose their own heroes. In a show of solidarity, every living president of Ukraine returned their Order of the White Eagle. Behind this symbolic gesture lies a fundamental question: who has the right to decide whom the Ukrainian people should regard as their heroes? Ukraine condemns the mass killing of civilians — both Polish and Ukrainian — and acknowledges that the conflict in Volhynia involved violence by both sides. At the same time, Ukrainians honour those UPA fighters who fought for independence against both the Soviet and Nazi regimes.

On 26 May, ahead of Ukraine’s Special Operations Forces Day, President Zelenskyy conferred the honorary designation “Heroes of the UPA” on the Separate Special Operations Centre “North” of the Special Operations Forces. This was not a spontaneous decision: the initiative came from the military personnel themselves, who are fighting against Russia, and was endorsed by the president. Ukrainian military units and streets have been named after figures from the country’s liberation movement for years. Roman Shukhevych was awarded the title of Hero of Ukraine in 2007, Stepan Bandera in 2010, and a major avenue in Kyiv was named after Bandera in 2016.

This time, however, Poland’s response has been driven largely by domestic politics. Unlike his predecessor Andrzej Duda, Karol Nawrocki made extensive use of anti-Ukrainian rhetoric during his campaign in Poland’s 2025 presidential election. Paradoxically, in 2023, while serving as head of Poland’s Institute of National Remembrance, Nawrocki said: “I recognise that Ukrainians have the right to choose their own heroes. If they regard Stepan Bandera or Roman Shukhevych as heroes, it is not for Poles to decide whom Ukrainian streets should be named after.” His current position contradicts what he himself declared three years ago.

Honouring the UPA does not mean approving of everything that happened during those tragic years. Ukraine condemns the mass killing of civilians — both Polish and Ukrainian — and acknowledges that the conflict in Volhynia involved violence by both sides. For more on our assessment of those events, see our article on the Volhynia tragedy. At the same time, Ukrainians primarily honour those UPA fighters who fought for independence against the Soviet and Nazi regimes. Their struggle forms part of Ukraine’s liberation movement — just as Poland has the right to honour its own independence fighters, some of whom also fought against Ukrainians.

For the first time in many years, Ukraine’s former and current presidents — representing different political eras and often finding themselves on opposing sides of political disputes — have publicly demonstrated a united position. Ukraine is grateful to Poland for its invaluable support during the war and has a strong interest in maintaining its strategic partnership with Poland. But there is one principle on which we will not compromise: no country has the right to decide for another whom it should regard as its heroes. The Kremlin stands to benefit most from this dispute, as we explained in a separate article, which is precisely why both sides must find a path towards dialogue.

Looking for More Answers?

Your feedback is important to us! In case you still have questions or you have not been able to find the needed information on the website, feel free to contact us. Our team will help you to find answers to your questions and provide you with all necessary information.

    Ask a question